DLC: Harvesting for the Future: the Indiana Light Archive of Government Information
Posted by Valerie on November 2, 2007
Wednesday, October 17th, 10:30 am
4 Indiana libraries (IU Bloomington, Purdue, Indiana State Library, and U of Notre Dame) have joined forces to create a light archive for federal depository materials in the state.
Lou Malcomb (IU Bloomington) :
One trigger – increased discard lists & the realization that they couldn’t check everything
Another: space issues at IU-Bloomington (remote storage facility, alf, is preservation environment)
- used ddm to assess duplication/overlap of item selection
ALF (Auxilliary Library Facility)
- defined delivery standards, which keep improving
- alf has a scanner so that some materials can be scanned, if not borrowable
- try to deliver electronically (ie, and make this a true light archive)
had to define restricted use criteria
examining shared cataloging responsibilities and shared records mgmt
licensing – try to include ILL for print, if not electronic
reason for overwhelming support – not telling anyone they have to get rid of anything; it is a state of Indiana collection; wanted to keep the regional in place
ALF is now 80% full – ALF2 is on the way. This meant that IUB could not house anything
Distributed model – 1 archive, 4 places
In worldcat, trying to indicate whose copy is the Indiana light archive copy – this will facilitate ILL
Trying to figure out what is missing, so that it can be ‘harvested’ – from other collections, offers lists, etc.
Guidelines for disposal instruct depositories that they don’t need to list anything between 1976 and 5 years ago; - assumption that the 4 collection stewards will have allows focus on pre-76 items
Katie springer (regional perspective)
Using gpo model for state-wide needs & offers site - hosted at the state library
Lou for bert:
Q: how was sudoc collection broken up? Based on collection strength?
- see bert’s slides on determining agency steward responsibilities (ppt slides 23-32)
- determined collection strengths
- used knowledge of selective depository strengths
stewardship responsibilities do not assume that you own everything or even want everything
Cheryl truesdell - IFPW
superseded materials??
- still trying to decide what responsibilities exist regarding superseded materials
- from now on, will be keeping supserseded copies; not sure what to do about previously weeded items
role of other Indiana selectives (collaborators):
- assist in the completion of the collection in a selected sudoc area by filling in gaps
- cataloging materials in agreement with the collection steward
- provide reference and/or instruction for a selected SuDoc area
- provide or assist in professional development training in a specific SuDoc area
- assist in publicizing the light archive
Q&A:
breakdown of sudoc – not just a’s, c’s, etc. (also: a collection steward is responsible for all iterations of an agency, usually. Dates are also used)
- compiled a written history of cataloging practice w/docs in each institution
- IU’s alf – anyone can request, with just a name; 24 hour turnaround
- trying to keep the tangible in the light archive – emphasize looking for digital version first
- adding urls to catalog records
- IU negotiated for ILL access to digital serial set
- Are scanned documents available for preservation?
- Nope; don’t meet digital library standards; some larger documents are available as access copies
Goal is to create a light archive – NOT a digital library
Collection stewards – catalogers are getting together (project subcommittee)
Are talking to oclc as well
Conser, bibco, naco level
Still trying to work out cataloging of items not owned by a steward
Balancing cataloging with delivery – also wrestling with detail of records
more info about the archive is available from IU
Posted in FDLP, Fed Docs, Regional Depositories, shared collections | No Comments »